False racism... and more...
Average White Band had a hit or two in the 1970's -- a hit or two more
than the average band no less. While I'm not seeking airplay, I find myself to be an average
white guy in very abnormal and radical times. In an allegedly post-racial time in which
President Obama and Congress purport to fix the budget deficit by spending money, seek to
improve the economy by passing horrific, burdensome energy regulations, push a national health
care overhaul on a populus fearful of big government overreach, and preach individual financial
responsibility while dangling free money to incentivize more unaffordable borrowing (read:
Cash For Clunkers), racism, or at least accusations thereof, has become a tool.
We see it almost daily in the health care "debate."
- Rep. Diane Watson of Louisiana told town hall constituents that opponents are
"trying to see that the first president who looks like me -- fails."
(hear the exchange) Ms. Watson, with
all due respect, what on Earth does health care reform have to do with the fact that the
President is black?
- Rep. John Dingell of Michigan said on MSNBC: "Well, the last time I had to confront
something like this [town hall protests] was when I voted for the civil rights bill and
my opponent voted against it. At that time, we had a lot of Ku Klux Klan folks and white
supremacists and folks in white sheets and other things running around causing trouble." (watch this)
The inference, per Mr. Dingell, is that opponents of the health care bill in Congress are
akin to KKK members and pesty white supremacists.
- Syndicated columnist Cynthia Tucker, appearing on MSNBC told us, about health care
protesters: "I think 45 to 65% of the people who appear at these groups who will never be
comfortable with the idea of a black president." (watch this) The inference? If you're against this
reform package, you're a racist.
This rhetoric defies common sense; we should not need to state that reasonable people can
and do disagree, for any myriad of reasons, on the health care reform debate. Those
passionate enough in their opposition (or their support, for that matter) to bring their
views directly to their congressmen are -- well, passionate about their views and not,
by virtue of that, racists. Reasonable people -- and even many less than reasonable
people -- know this.
The intensity and consistency of the rhetoric leaves some honest questions -- questions
we can't easily answer.
- The link between racism and opposition to this health care package seems coordinated.
Whose idea was it?
- What is the intent of calling opponents racist? Is it to bring shame upon them? Is
it to discredit them so that the viewpoint itself is tarnished? Is it to intimidate
them into shutting their mouths? Is it to make them fearful of speaking out? Are proponents afraid
of debate? Do they believe that if serious debate is permitted, they will certainly lose? And if
THAT is true, why would Congress and the President wish to pass a bill held up without debate and
guaranteed to crumble WITH debate?
- Why is this particular bill SO important as to justify these race-baiting tactics?
- Months after America elected a black president for the
very first time, why is the President and why are Congress set on race-baiting at all?
Shouldn't the very nature of this past election make that strategy foolhardy?
Perhaps the most shortsighted and exasperating aspect of this approach is the
trivializing of real, actual racism. To use a "boy who cried wolf" strategy of
invoking racism falsley in a debate about anything but is to discredit the real
problem of racism and to marginalize actual victims of racism -- a dangerous
side-effect that could haunt America well after these folks are no longer in the
public eye. True victims of racism thus should be quite offended by the spectacle
taking place.
- HQ staff
|
|
|
Coming This Week:
The basic principles for which we stand -- can you disagree?
The people surrounding the Congress
Central government as a necessary evil ...our view
The history of the federal income tax
Why slippery slope theory is REAL
Our read of the Constitution
|
|
|